Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 85,017
WOODWARD v. MATLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv05468
Plaintiff: SHAWN A. WOODWARD
Defendant: CAPTAIN MATLOCK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY v. PARROTT
as 2:2024cv05460
Plaintiff: H. TORY POSEY
Defendant: JEFFREY M. PARROTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Joseph Rubino
as 24-1681
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOSEPH RUBINO
Jordan v. Barves et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant: J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Matevousion et al
as 4:2024cv00695
Petitioner: Ronald E. Goodloe
Respondent: Andre Matevousion, Warden Thomas E. Bargami and B. Potes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hollingsworth v. Yellen
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff: Thomas A. Hollingsworth, Jr.
Defendant: Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner: CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
SHAMRO v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv00608
Petitioner: JOSH SHAMRO
Respondent: PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD and SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI MERCER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacombe v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: Claude P. Lacombe
Defendant: James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Warden and Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner: JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?