Cases 111 - 120 of 737,395
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
ELMER DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Notarc Port Investment LLC, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
LANDBRIDGE PORT SERVICES HONG KONG LTD
Defendant:
NOTARC PORT INVESTMENT LLC, NOTARC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC, COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LLC and others
Andrew Podems v. Union County Child Support Enforcement Unit, et al
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
ANDREW M. PODEMS
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT UNIT, THERESA E. MULLER, Hearing Officer (spelling Muller?), JAMES HELY, Hearing Officer and others
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, et al v. Secretary United States Department of Health and H, et al
as 24-1819
Plaintiff:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA AB
Defendant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ADMINISTRATOR CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vanderpool et al v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Roxie Vanderpool, Rickie Vanderpool, Allie Vanderpool and others
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Gregory Davis, Peter Derieux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON et al v. EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 1:2024cv05812
Plaintiff:
BREE WILSON and H. W.
Defendant:
EVESHAM TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
