Cases 111 - 120 of 282
PIERCE v. CAVALRY SPV I, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00588
Plaintiff:
LINDA R. PIERCE
Defendant:
CAVALRY SPV I, LLC, JORGE M. PEREIRA and THE LAW OF BUSINESS, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SHANER v. KELLY et al
as 2:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
ROBERT R. SHANER
Defendant:
LINDA L. KELLY, JACK HENEKS, JR. and JAMES A. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv07153
Plaintiff:
WALLACE CHAMBERS , GREG FIELDS , DUSTIN FOX and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al
as 2:2012cv01640
Plaintiff:
MAXIM INTEGRATED PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2012cv03923
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PIERCE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PIERCE v. SUPERINTENDENT DAVID W. PITKINS et al
as 3:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. PIERCE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DAVID W. PITKINS, MS. ANNETTE KOWALESKI, MR. R.D. MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIRCHER v. PIERCE et al
as 2:2012cv00528
Plaintiff:
WARREN ERNEST BIRCHER, SR.
Defendant:
JAMES A. PIERCE and SCOTT KROFCHEK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHELPS v. PFIZER INC.
as 2:2012cv02128
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BROOKS PIERCE PHELPS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
