Cases 111 - 120 of 203
HALL v. USA
as 1:2016cv01252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
LARRY HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BURWELL
as 1:2016cv00811
Plaintiff:
HEART OF FLORIDA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER , STRINGFELLOW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, RIVERVIEW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HALL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv00807
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JARTA HALL
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and FREDERICK ONOJA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALL v. LYNCH
as 1:2016cv00473
Petitioner:
CLYDE WILLIAMS HALL, JR.
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL v. WMATA
as 1:2016cv00279
Defendant:
WMATA
Plaintiff:
CARRIE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc01404
Plaintiff:
JACK SNIADO, ARVIND SUNDAR, MICHAEL KROMAR and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, FREDERICK ISAACSON, AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. and others
Special Master:
RICHARD A. LEVIE
In Re:
IN RE: DOMESTIC AIRLINE TRAVEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Undetermined:
INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
GARRETT v. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
as 1:2015cv01647
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GARRETT
Defendant:
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and MICHAEL LOUIS HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. HALL et al
as 1:2015cv01355
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
E. HALL, MARCHANELLO, BITENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
