Cases 111 - 120 of 155
Brown v. Caddo Parish Sheriff Department
as 5:2012cv01827
Plaintiff:
Conner Ray Brown
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Caddo Parish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Caddo Parish Sheriff Department Emergency Response Team
as 3:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Conner Ray Brown
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Sheriff Department Emergency Response Team
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Botley v. Edwards et al
as 2:2012cv01789
Plaintiff:
Villmon Botley, Jr
Defendant:
Richard Edwards, Jr, Derrick W Haught, Michael C Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Shreveport
as 5:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant:
City Court of Shreveport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross et al v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association
as 2:2012cv01250
Defendant:
Southwest Louisiana Hospital Association
Plaintiff:
Lori D Ross and Courtney Conner
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Major et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01210
Plaintiff:
Courtney Major , Joseph Major , Baby Bellanger and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Fluor Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Francis v. Conner et al
as 6:2012cv00668
Plaintiff:
Breion L Francis
Defendant:
Manuel Conner , Cherokee Insurance Co and Source Logistics Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Exco Resources, Inc
as 1:2011cv02206
Plaintiff:
Michael Conner
Defendant:
Exco Resources, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Conner v. Kraemer Shows Oilfield Services L L C
as 5:2011cv02206
Plaintiff:
Michael Conner
Defendant:
Exco Resources Inc , Noram Drilling Co and Kraemer Shows Oilfield Services L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conner v. Weyerhaeuser Co et al
as 1:2011cv02066
Plaintiff:
David E Conner
Defendant:
Weyerhaeuser Co and Union Pacific Railroad Co
Counter_claimant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Counter_defendant:
David E Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
