Cases 111 - 120 of 127
Mays v. Davenport et al
as 2:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
Michael Mays
Respondent:
Carter Davenport , State of Alabama and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scales v. Davenport et al
as 4:2011cv00231
Petitioner:
Louis Joesph Scales
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Davenport et al
as 5:2011cv00037
Petitioner:
Corey M Scott
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ball v. Davenport et al
as 4:2010cv03609
Petitioner:
Gregory Ball
Respondent:
Carter Davenport and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morgan v. Davenport et al
as 1:2010cv00665
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tyrone Morgan
Defendant:
Carter Davenport, Walter Myers, Richard Hetrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyatt v. Allen et al
as 1:2010cv00517
Plaintiff:
Marvis M. Wyatt
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Carter Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alverson v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00645
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alverson
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Louis Boyd, Carter Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hendrick et al
as 1:2010cv00368
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Capt. Hendrick, Carter Davenport, Warden Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Boyd et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv01169
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Henderson
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Carter Davenport, Ms. Caffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Boyd et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv01117
Plaintiff:
DeMarquies Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Louis Boyd, Carter Davenport, Jameka Caffie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
