Cases 111 - 120 of 238
John Doe 1, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 14-2116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICK SNYDER, DANIEL H. HEYNS and others
Daniel Horacek v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 14-2057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL HORACEK
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director, MDOC, MICHAEL MARTIN, CFA Special Activities Director, MDOC and BRAD PURVIS, CFA Foodservice, MDOC
Jones v. Parrish et al
as 4:2014cv13153
Plaintiff:
Tremain Jones
Defendant:
Lynn Parrish, D. Maynard, Jay Kimbill and others
Jackson #240101 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00837
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson #240101
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, M. Davis, DeWayne Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson #240101 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00838
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson #240101
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Sean Young, Unknown Crowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley Denhof v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 14-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY GENE DENHOF
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN, STATE OF, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Prisons and others
Sean Ryan v. Unknown Norwood, et al
as 14-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SEAN MICHAEL RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN NORWOOD, Deputy, C. O. LEWIS, Grievance Coordinator, WILLIE SMITH, Warden, named as W. Smith and others
Wittman v. Reaume et al
as 2:2014cv12954
Plaintiff:
Brian Wittman
Defendant:
Rosemary Reaume , R Davonport , Rick Raymond and others
Campbell et al v. Greeky et al
as 2:2014cv12897
Plaintiff:
Ewania Campbell, Jeffrey Campbell, Brian Theriot and others
Defendant:
Timothy P Greeky, Christina Campbell, Kevin Thom and others
Jackson #240101 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00780
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jackson #240101
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, DeWayne Burton, M. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
