Cases 111 - 120 of 593
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ellis v. Sealey et al
as 1:2021cv04398
Defendant:
Carol Ann Jordan and Rhonda P. Sealey
Plaintiff:
William Ellis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02592
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Moore, Mr. Miclteler, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demeris Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Percy et al v. D & D Metal Work Inc et al
as 1:2021cv02182
Defendant:
D & F Development Group, D & D Metal Work Inc, Delta and others
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation an IRC 501(c)(3) non-profit, as Class Representatives, Albert E. Percy and Percy Jobs and Careers Corporation
Amicus Curiae:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Samiti Technology Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Ellis Lee
Defendant:
Samiti Technology Inc. and Parmi Cheema
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chirse v. Pauselius et al
as 6:2021cv06079
Defendant:
Martin, J. Aiulla, Sgt. D. Pauselius and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chirse v. Pauselius et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Defendant:
Martin, J. Aiulla, Sgt. D. Pauselius and others
Plaintiff:
Devante Chirse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Collado
as 1:2020cv06394
Petitioner:
Robert Ellis
Respondent:
Jaifa Collado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
