Cases 111 - 120 of 859
(PC) Hill v. Cross et al
as 2:2022cv01464
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Ada R. Cross, Counselor Contreas, P. Sahota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carlos Hernandez v. M. Gamboa et al
as 5:2022cv01371
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Partida et al
as 4:2022cv04461
Plaintiff:
Bruce M Dixon
Defendant:
Ms. Partida, L. Gamboa, I Mondragon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2022cv01111
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GAMBOA v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2022cv02166
Plaintiff:
JOBELLE DIZON GAMBOA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and LOREN K. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
George Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2022cv05054
Plaintiff:
George Abaray, Juan Adame, Jerry Adcox and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hill v. Cross et al
as 4:2022cv04196
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon Hill
Defendant:
Ada R. Cross, Counselor Contreas, P. Sahota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Chavez v. Gamboa
as 2:2022cv01173
Petitioner:
Ulises Chavez
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
