Cases 111 - 119 of 119
Little v. Easley et al
as 5:2009ct03069
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rydell Little
Defendant:
Michael F. Easley, Roy Cooper, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lail v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00057
Plaintiff:
Garland Vance Lail
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00572
Plaintiff:
GARLAND EDWARD JONES
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Fulcher
as 4:2008cv00059
Plaintiff:
Garland Christopher Fulcher
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fulcher v. The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
as 4:2008cv00060
Plaintiff:
Garland Christopher Fulcher
Defendant:
The Vessel Dixie Haertel, Official No: 997486, her engines, tackle, electronics and apparel, etc., in rem
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOYCE v. RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2008cv00144
Plaintiff:
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE
Defendant:
RANDOLPH COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, VANCE BRADFORD LONG, LACY H. THORNBURG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tompkins v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2007ct03152
Plaintiff:
Stuart Wayne Tompkins
Defendant:
Department of Correction, T. R. Carroll, Chris Batten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
F/V CAPTAIN GARLAND, INC.
as 7:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
F/V CAPTAIN GARLAND, INC.
Claimant:
Estate of Fernando Martinez Huerta
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 183 Limitation of Liability
Garland et al v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. et al
as 1:2007cv00094
Plaintiff:
Inez C. Garland and Roy Garland
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Bell Asbesots Mines, Ltd., Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
