Cases 111 - 120 of 143
MARTINEZ v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2014cv01459
Plaintiff:
SAUL MARTINEZ
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., JOSEPH TAVARES, GC WIGEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KALU v. WIGEN et al
as 3:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
KALU KALU
Defendant:
GEORGE WIGEN, P. JUSTER, SCOTT BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2013cv00272
Plaintiff:
RONALD GREENLAND
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MR. BENSON, CAMERON LINDSAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LONGORIA-LACHAPELLE v. MR. CAMERON LINDSAY et al
as 3:2011cv00224
Petitioner:
VINICIO JAVIER LONGORIA-LACHAPELLE
Respondent:
MR. CAMERON LINDSAY, GEO GROUP INC. and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
WILLIAMS v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 5:2011cv01087
Plaintiff:
SHARAE LYNN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY , GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY (DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON) , JOHN A. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOMUANO v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
CARLOS SOMUANO
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC. and CAMERON LINDSAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
KAMAL K. PATEL
Defendant:
CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., GEORGE KILLINGER, MICHAEL ZENK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patel v. Cornell Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kamal K. Patel
Defendant:
Cornell Companies, Inc., George Killinger, Michael Zenk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
