Cases 111 - 120 of 183
Hamilton v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2014cv01460
Plaintiff:
Shannon Hamilton
Defendant:
Gregory Scott Dempsey and The City of Childersburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps-Hamilton v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 2:2014cv00550
Plaintiff:
Nicoa Phelps-Hamilton
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc., and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin-El v. Griffin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Marvin Franklin-El
Defendant:
Gregory O. Griffin, Meredith Hamilton Barnes, Dana Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Sandrew Doss
Defendant:
Hamilton, W Northcutt, McQueen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Posey v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00943
Plaintiff:
Clark L. Posey, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Frank Albright, Victor L. Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00883
Plaintiff:
Shandalynn Hamilton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Avectus Health Care Solutions LLC
as 5:2013cv01967
Plaintiff:
James Frank Hamilton
Defendant:
Avectus Health Care Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Polion v. The City of Greensboro et al
as 2:2013cv00244
Plaintiff:
Morris Polion
Defendant:
The City of Greensboro, Willie Hudson and Michael Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00281
Plaintiff:
David D. Hamilton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Cassandra Conway and Dewayne Estes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Oliver
as 1:2013cv00164
Petitioner:
Steve Hamilton, Jr.
Respondent:
Noah Price Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
