Cases 111 - 120 of 271
Perez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02368
Tax 923891:
Lt. Lanier Glenn
Defendant:
John Does 1 and 2 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Means v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02229
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe 1 through 2 and Police Officer Sylvia Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Nakia Means
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02230
Defendant:
City of New York and John Doe 1 through 2
Plaintiff:
Virice Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belgrove v. The County of Albany et al
as 1:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Emajin Belgrove
Defendant:
The County of Albany, Craig D. Apple, Sr. and John Doe #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villar et al v. Abreu et al
as 1:2016cv01770
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Villar and Davon Walker
Defendant:
Esteban Abreu, City Of New York and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Downs
as 6:2016cv00401
Respondent:
Robert Downs
Petitioner:
Timothy Arthur Perry
Defendant:
United States Prisoner Transport and John Does 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hayes v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 1:2016cv01537
Defendant:
The City of Yonkers , Thomas Braig and John Does 1 and 2
Plaintiff:
Damon Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. The City Of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Defendant:
John Does 1 and 2 and The City Of New York
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Ortiz
Tax No. 924346:
Detective Michael Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00046
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Schopmeyer v. City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jack Schopmeyer
Defendant:
City Of New York, Dash and John Doe 1 and 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
