Cases 111 - 120 of 213
Lane et al v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Richard Lane and Lynn Lane
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butler v. Hawkins County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2015cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Butler
Defendant:
Hawkins County Sheriff Office, Scott Stewart, Tony Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Jackson Lane Adams and Terri June Adams
Defendant:
Martin Enterprises of the Carolinas, Inc. and Jesse Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03001
Plaintiff:
Karen Lane
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. Bevill et al
as 4:2014cv00082
Defendant:
Robert L Bevill, Lane Management, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Properties, LLC
Plaintiff:
MARTA G WILLIAMS and MARLEEN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Vandiver v. Bevill et al
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Teresa Vandiver
Defendant:
Robert L Bevill, Lane Management, Inc. and Tennessee Valley Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Person v. Roach et al
as 2:2014cv02788
Defendant:
Ashley Roach , Lauderdale County , The City Of Ripley and others
Plaintiff:
Earma Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montague et al v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Charles Montague, Derrick Payne, Christopher Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Centurion, Georgia Crowell, Bill Haslam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01825
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. The Lane Construction Corporation
as 3:2014cv01129
Plaintiff:
Titus Carter
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
