Cases 111 - 120 of 140
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv12634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type:
Civil Rights
Lane v. Howes
as 2:2009cv12254
Petitioner:
Carlos Lane
Respondent:
Carol Howes
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2009cv11371
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lane
Defendant:
Michael King, William Hubbard, Donald Woods and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
PT Pukuafu Indah et al v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission et al
as 2:2009cv10943
Plaintiff:
PT Pukuafu Indah, PT Tanjung Sera Pung, Leonard L.J. Young and others
Defendant:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, Mary L. Schapiro, Export Import Bank of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cook v. Caruso et al
as 2:2009cv10892
Plaintiff:
Gregory Cook
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Dennis Straub, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Shannon v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv10420
Plaintiff:
Darren Shannon
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Raymond Booker, Kenneth Romanowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Oginskis et al
as 2:2008cv13838
Plaintiff:
LeKendrick Lawun Murphy
Defendant:
Rokas Eliyahu Oginskis and Molly Lane Oginskis
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2008cv00769
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv13593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Lane #143051 v. Isaacs et al
as 1:2008cv00596
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lane #143051
Defendant:
G. A. Isaacs, Thomas Bell, Blaine C. Lafler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
