Cases 111 - 120 of 485
Sahagun v. Lane
as 1:2017cv01919
Petitioner:
Alexander Rodriguez Sahagun
Respondent:
Kathy P. Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alsop v. Lane
as 3:2017cv01737
Petitioner:
Christopher Alsop
Respondent:
Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JACKSON v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2017cv01237
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JACKSON
Defendant:
ERIC T. ARMEL, DEBRA A. HAWKINBERRY, WILLIAM TIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BRETT v. ANTHONY UNKNOWN et al
as 2:2017cv04204
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
ANTHONY UNKNOWN, SALVATORE UNKNOWN, PAUL MARSELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SBG MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2017cv04102
Plaintiff:
SBG MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. , ELRAE GARDEN REALTY CO., LP , FAIRMOUNT GARDEN REALTY, CO., LP and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HTUT v. LANE et al
as 5:2017cv04021
Petitioner:
WIN MIN HTUT
Respondent:
JAY LANE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01576
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
STONE v. LANE et al
as 2:2017cv01068
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. STONE
Defendant:
JAY LANE, STEPHEN M. GATES, REBECCA PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Toaz v. Lane et al
as 3:2017cv01425
Plaintiff:
Craig Alan Toaz
Defendant:
Kathy P. Lane, D. Altizer, C. Rothermel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stoss v. Lane et al
as 1:2017cv01253
Petitioner:
Arthur F. Stoss, Sr.
Respondent:
Jay Lane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
