Cases 111 - 120 of 264
Murphy v. Carter (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00444
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Murphy
Defendant:
Derrick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Berryhill (CONSENT)
as 2:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
Bernice Murphy
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Russell v Thomas et al
as 2:2017cv00763
Plaintiff:
Antonio Russell
Defendant:
Terry Thomas, Murphy, Jeffrey Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Cook
as 1:2017cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tracie McMichael Murphy
Defendant:
Jonathan David Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGaskill v. Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00150
Plaintiff:
Sheadrick McGaskill
Defendant:
Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc. , Stephen W. Spellman, Jr. , Frank B. Merrill, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Law et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
William Rodney Jones
Defendant:
David Law, Scotty Frank Jones, Coosa County Probate Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Odom
Defendant:
Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe, Inc., Stephen W. Spellman, Jr., Frank B. Merrill, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones v. Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Sylvester J. Jones
Defendant:
Bahama Bob's Beachside Cafe Inc. , Stephan W. Spellman, Jr. , Frank B. Merrill, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Murphy v. Bailey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00968
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Murphy
Defendant:
Daryl D. Bailey, Montgomery County Commission, Montgomery County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. City of Montgomery et al(MAG+)(MEMBER CASE)
as 2:2016cv00950
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
City of Montgomery and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
