Cases 111 - 120 of 196
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Justin Tafua v. Juan Rodriguez et al
as 2:2015cv08802
Defendant:
Bandeljo Colon, Bandeljo Colon, Lisa Connor and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Tafua
Adame et al v. McLane
as 4:2015cv02175
Plaintiff:
Robert Adame, Steven Alvarez, Paul Ayala and others
Defendant:
Marsha McLane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2015cv02071
Plaintiff:
Virgil L Moore
Defendant:
Wilford A Anderson, Robert Scott, Jim Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Capital Cove Bancorp LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00980
Defendant:
Capital Cove Bancorp LLC and Christopher M Lee
Interested Party:
Geraci Law Firm
Receiver:
Robert P. Mosier
Claimant:
Kristine Joy Mosqueda, Roman Mosqueda and Ryan Christopher Mosqueda
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Susanna Cohen-Feris et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00096
Plaintiff:
Susanna Cohen-Feris , Sally Antone , Randi Andrews and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bruce Morton v. Correctional Officer J. Perez et al
as 2:2015cv02093
Defendant:
A Warden T. Busby, Captain T. Cromwell, Lieutenant T. Goetz and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Morton
Mosqueda v. Federal National Mortgage Association
as 4:2014cv03692
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Cecil Mosqueda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
