Cases 111 - 120 of 130
Shaw v. Deputy Aguirre et al
as 1:2009cv00834
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Shaw
Defendant:
Deputy Aguirre and Deputy Mireles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowser v. Gloucester County Circuit Court et al
as 3:2009cv00444
Plaintiff:
Clarence Bowser
Defendant:
Gloucester County Circuit Court, William H. Shaw, III, Warren Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Shaw v. Johnson
as 2:2009cv00126
Petitioner:
Anthony Dawain Shaw
Respondent:
Gene M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw v. Hill
as 2:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dawain Shaw
Defendant:
Richard E. Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw et al v. KGS et al
as 6:2008cv00024
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Shaw, KGS, CAS and others
Defendant:
Lisa Vogel
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw et al v. Lynchburg Department of Social Services et al
as 6:2008cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tammy J. Shaw, KGS, CAS and others
Defendant:
Lynchburg Department of Social Services, Bob McDonnell, Eleanor Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaw Environmental, Inc. et al v. TMS Envirocon, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
Shaw Environmental, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc. and others
Defendant:
TMS Envirocon, Inc., Gulf Insurance Company and Travelers Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Higgs v. Wright et al
as 3:2008cv00170
Plaintiff:
Moses Nathaniel Higgs
Defendant:
Ed Wright, Derr, Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
