Cases 111 - 120 of 257
PRYER v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 2:2010cv03126
Petitioner:
KHARY PRYER
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT, PENN.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BILLMAN v. CORBETT et al
as 5:2010cv02996
Plaintiff:
JAMES BILLMAN
Defendant:
TOM CORBETT and BRIAN WESTMORELAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Wesley-EL v. Rozum, et al
as 10-2766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY-EL
Defendant - Appellee:
GERALD L. ROZUM, Superintendent for S.C.I. Somerset, ATTY GEN PA, SUPERINTENDENT SCI SOMERSET and others
PISKANIN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00153
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRANT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2010cv00785
Petitioner:
TAIBU GRANT
Respondent:
MELVIN LOCKETT and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRONSON v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2010cv00143
Petitioner:
PURCELL BRONSON
Respondent:
DAVID CLOSE, TOM CORBETT, STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSS v. CORBETT et al
as 2:2010cv02138
Petitioner:
BEDFORD ROSS
Respondent:
TOM CORBETT, RICHARD SCHOLER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALEXANDER v. BRITTON et al
as 2:2010cv02008
Petitioner:
LEON ALEXANDER
Respondent:
RANDALL BRITTON , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alton Brown v. William Stickman, et al
as 10-2212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, GREGORY J. SIMATIC, GRESS, Nurse and others
Winston v. Rendell et al
as 1:2010cv00867
Plaintiff:
Michael Winston
Defendant:
Edward Rendell, Tom Corbett, Frank E Pawlowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
