Cases 111 - 120 of 7,191
Huey v. Levy & Associates
as 4:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Robin Huey
Defendant:
Levy & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Knightbrook Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv04180
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Knightbrook Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Griak v. United States of America
as 0:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Mylon Robert Griak
Defendant:
United States of America
Shaff et al v. Claymore et al
as 3:2023cv03029
Plaintiff:
Sarah Shaff and Keith Fodness
Defendant:
Judge Brenda Claymore, Judge Margaret Egan and Charles Red Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Clay County Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
Clay County, Missouri and Clay County Commission
John Doe v. SSM Health Care Corporation
as 23-3138
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Doe, Individually and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
SSM Health Care Corporation, doing business as SSM Health
Nelson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
as 6:2023cv03339
Plaintiff:
Betsy Nelson
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper and Cenlar Agency, Inc. doing business as Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
USA v. Payen
as 6:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Laguerre Payen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
USA v. Del Campo
as 6:2023cv03319
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Raymon Del Campo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Jones et al v. Papa John's International, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Ann Jones and Jane Tenzer
Defendant:
Papa Johns International, Inc. and Papa John's International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
