Cases 111 - 120 of 8,749
Grady v. Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Alabama Bureau of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Storey v. Cunningham (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Melvin Storey
Defendant:
Derrick Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alonso v. McClain et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Santiago Alonso
Defendant:
Antonio McClain and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Mayes (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mardedues L Mack
Defendant:
E. Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. Jones (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00746
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Dudley, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riley v. Abbett et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Riley
Defendant:
Jimmy Abbett, Blake Jennings, Lt. Naile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Smithart et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Burt Smithart, Ben Reeves and Rebecca Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Council v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council and Kinetik Justice
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, John Hamm, Cheryl Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
