Cases 121 - 130 of 20,827
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kelly v. O'Malley, et al
as 24-1306
Plaintiff:
DANNY M. KELLY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Northup v. Reilly et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Thomas Northup
Defendant:
William Reilly and Andrew Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro v. Romero-Lugo et al
as 3:2024cv01161
Plaintiff:
Ramon E. Castro
Defendant:
Miguel A. Romero-Lugo, Conjugal Partnership Romero-Doe, Vanessa Y. Jimenez-Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Vazquez et al
as 3:2024cv01160
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carlos Vazquez and Ligia Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Briggs, et al v. Scanlan, et al
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
LYNN-DIANE BRIGGS, WAYNE P. SAYA, SR. and KAREN TESTERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, Secretary of State, NH and CHRIS AGER, Chairman, NH Republican State Committee
Interested Party:
NORMAN J. SILBER
Brown v. Leslie et al
as 1:2024cv10854
Plaintiff:
Keith Brown
Defendant:
Michael Leslie, Keith Barnes, Beau Lirette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nunez v. Luciw et al
as 1:2024cv10848
Plaintiff:
Jorge Luis Nunez
Defendant:
Mikayla Marie Luciw, Megan Green and City of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bowman et al v Monteiro et al
as 1:2024cv10850
Plaintiff:
Leo Bowman and Zirahuen Bowman
Defendant:
Sgt Agnaldo P Monteiro, Officer William Hull, Officer Brenden Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
