Cases 121 - 130 of 134
Stepheny v. Baker et al
as 3:2008cv03290
Plaintiff:
Wade Stepheny, Jr
Defendant:
C A Baker, G L Bell, D B Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Oglesby v. Aqua-Chem Inc et al
as 8:2008cv03058
Plaintiff:
Julian Wade Oglesby
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem Inc, Borg-Warner Morse TEC Inc, Certainteed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Wade v. Powers et al
as 3:2008cv01905
Plaintiff:
Dustin Jerry Wade
Defendant:
Larry W Powers and Spartanburg Detention Center Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Lamb et al
as 2:2008cv01527
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Marie Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Wade Lamb and Lynne Sistrunk Mims
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Riches v. O'Neal et al
as 6:2008cv01122
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Sahquille O'Neal and Dwayne Wade
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bardes v. Magera et al
as 2:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
David A Bardes
Defendant:
John M Magera, State Of South Carolina, Charleston County South Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephney v. Ozmint et al
as 8:2008cv00411
Plaintiff:
Wade Stephney, Jr
Defendant:
John Ozmint, Michael Mathews and Sandra Knowlin
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Littlejohn v. Ozmint et al
as 4:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
Tron Manvel Littlejohn
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, James Sligh, Robert Ward and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Small et al v. Reeves et al
as 2:2007cv03803
Plaintiff:
Wade J Small, Jr, Mary T Davis Small and Lauren Danielle Bellew
Defendant:
Kenneth Dale Reeves and Alabama Carriers Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wade v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv02824
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections and Anthony Padula
Plaintiff:
Charles Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
