Cases 121 - 130 of 2,398
Gooldy v. Lake County and Juvenile Courts et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Gooldy and Jennifer Gooly
Defendant:
Lake County Indiana Juvenile Courts, Jill Swope, Karyn Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00512
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR. and CHESTERFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH SR., RORIDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, LITTLEJOHN, KEVIN ELMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00943
Petitioner:
Jerry A Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
