Cases 121 - 130 of 207
KENNEDY et al v. ARAMARK HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02678
Plaintiff:
CHAL D. KENNEDY, SR.
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC , WALTER FLAHERTY , VERONICA LEMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayo v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01174
Plaintiff:
Alfred Alonzo Mayo
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Dorina Varner, Tracy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIXTH ANGEL SHEPHERD RESCUE, INC. et al v. SCHILERO et al
as 2:2013cv02098
Plaintiff:
SIXTH ANGEL SHEPHERD RESCUE, INC. , SAMANTHA KENNEY and TERRY SILVA
Defendant:
JAMES SCHILERO, GEORGE WINDSOR, BOROUGH OF MARCUS HOOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILVA v. CORLL et al
as 5:2013cv01283
Plaintiff:
RAMONA SILVA
Defendant:
RAY CORLL , LANCASTER BUREAU OF POLICE and CITY OF LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LENTZ et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05121
Plaintiff:
RENEE L. LENTZ , MELANIE C. DE LE REE , HALLEY BONFANTI and others
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COCK v. DA SILVA
as 2:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
WALLACE RUDECK STHEL COCK
Defendant:
VERAILDA MACIEL DA SILVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SILVA v. EXPRESS CABINET & GRANITE, LLC
as 2:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
ALFONSO D. SILVA
Defendant:
EXPRESS CABINET & GRANITE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
COUTINHO SILVA v. CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2011cv07498
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON JOSE COUTINHO SILVA
Defendant:
CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILVA v. SHOCKLEY
as 2:2011cv07330
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SILVA
Defendant:
T. SHOCKLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
