Cases 121 - 130 of 354
ALLEN v. JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-99
as 2:2018cv02709
Plaintiff:
KYLE ISHMAEL HASSAN ALLEN
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-99
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KMAN v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. KMAN, JR.
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARDARELLI v. AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv01928
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH CARDARELLI
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC. , AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. , AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01891
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DEMBY v. LANKENAU HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2018cv01387
Plaintiff:
EARL FRANCIS DEMBY, III.
Defendant:
LANKENAU HOSPITAL, EMPLOYER OF THOMAS BOWMAN, EMPLOYER OF JOHN DOE/JANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEEKINS v. DOC's GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAZZ MEEKINS
Defendant:
DOC's GRATERFORD, JOHN AND JANE DOE, J. HAWK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RADIANT IMAGES, INC. et al v. FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00758
Plaintiff:
RADIANT IMAGES, INC. and GIANNA WOLFE
Defendant:
FAST ADVANCE FUNDING, LLC and JOHN AND JANE DOE INVESTORS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
HARMON v. HARMON et al
as 2:2018cv00875
Plaintiff:
CURTIS T. HARMON, III
Defendant:
PAMELA HARMON and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1 -10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant:
JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
