Cases 121 - 130 of 248
Bester v. Kelly
as 2:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Charles Bester
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCoy v. MS Dept Corrections, et al
as 08-60756
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRUCE CALVIN MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and LAWRENCE KELLY
McCollins v. Kelly et al
as 2:2008cv00090
Petitioner:
Antonio Maurice Price McCollins
Respondent:
Lawrence Kelly and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00085
Plaintiff:
Kevin Terrence Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nelson v. Simmons, et al
as 08-60710
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIDNEY NELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
TIM SIMMONS, Warden and LAWRENCE KELLY
Brown v. Kelly
as 08-60692
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARA BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent, Mississippi State Penitentiary
Kennedy v. Epps, et al
as 08-60658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOLOMON S KENNEDY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent, JAMES BREWER, Area Warden and others
Walker, et al v. Epps, et al
as 08-60652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN DALE WALKER, PAUL EVERETTE WOODWARD and GERALD JAMES HOLLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman
Anderson v. Epps et al
as 4:2008cv00097
Plaintiff:
Levonzel Anderson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Timothy Morris and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bishop v. Epps, et al
as 08-70028
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE LEO BISHOP
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of Mississippi State Penitentiary at Parchman and JOHN DOES 1 - 50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
