Cases 121 - 130 of 236
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menzie v. Carter et al
as 3:2021cv00668
Plaintiff:
Ronald Menzie
Defendant:
Commissioner Robert E Carter, Jr and William Hyatte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENZIE v. CARTER et al
as 1:2021cv02364
Plaintiff:
RONALD MENZIE
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and WILLIAM HYATTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John A. Hawkins v. Robert E. Carter, Jr., et al
as 21-2228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN A. HAWKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., RON NEAL, CAPTAIN BOOTZ and others
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Hyatt et al
as 3:2021cv00328
Plaintiff:
Wally W Rice
Defendant:
Carl E Kuenzli, S. Morson, T. Riggle and others
Not Classified By Court:
PLAINFIELD E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Hyatt et al
as 1:2021cv00176
Plaintiff:
Wally W Rice
Defendant:
Carl E Kuenzli, S. Morson, T. Riggle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLINGSWORTH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant:
MIKE RAINS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, TODD ROKITA d/b/a, Indiana Attorney General, ERIC HOLCOMB d/b/a, Governor and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv01111
Defendant:
SHANNON SHOTT, DUSHAN ZATECKY, CHAD EVANS and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME MICHAEL OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. PEORISON et al
as 2:2021cv00191
Defendant:
D. FIRESTONE, MYER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE R. GREEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
