Cases 121 - 130 of 16,574
Harris v. USA
as 2:2024cv11293
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pointer v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
Kenneth Christopher Pointer
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nada v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv11245
Plaintiff:
Lynn C. Nada
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Squires et al v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv11166
Plaintiff:
Kelvin B Squires, Kelly S. Squires and Center Line Electric, Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Hall v. USA
as 2:2024cv11289
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Dontay Terrell Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
USA v. Gill
as 2:2024mc50465
Defendant:
Jagrant Singh Gill
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Ms. Kirandeep Gill
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Bell v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10859
Plaintiff:
Audrey Bell
Defendant:
United States of America
United States of America v. $7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$7,967.67 from Michigan State University Federal Credit Union Account Ending 8960
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Kramer et al
as 2:2024cv10822
Defendant:
Doron Kramer, Donald Kramer, Don Kramer and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Dickow et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv10858
Plaintiff:
Samantha Dickow and Gold'n Oven, Inc
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
