Cases 121 - 130 of 2,854
Chaucer Corporate Capital (No. 3) Ltd. v. Hyatt et al
as 3:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chaucer Corporate Capital (No. 3) Ltd.
Defendant:
Nathanael Hyatt and Angry Dragon Vapors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Simple Vapor Company, LLC v. FDA
as 21-3922
Petitioner:
SIMPLE VAPOR COMPANY, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Vaporized, Inc. v. FDA
as 21-60779
Petitioner:
Vaporized, Incorporated
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
E-Liquid Brands, LLC v. FDA
as 21-2121
Petitioner:
E-LIQUID BRANDS, LLC, as successor in interest to TOWN VAPOR CO.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cloud 9 Vapor Products v. FDA
as 21-9578
Petitioner:
CLOUD 9 VAPOR PRODUCTS, L.L.C.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Vapor Unlimited LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
as 21-13454
Petitioner:
VAPOR UNLIMITED LLC
Respondent:
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Wages and White Lion Invest v. FDA
as 21-60766
Petitioner:
Wages and White Lion Investments, L.L.C., doing business as Triton Distribution
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association and others
Not Classified By Court:
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company
Avail Vapor, LLC v. FDA
as 21-2077
Petitioner:
AVAIL VAPOR, LLC, BLACKSHIP TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT, LLC and BLACKBRIAR REGULATORY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Diamond Vapor LLC v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
as 21-13387
Petitioner:
DIAMOND VAPOR LLC
Respondent:
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Barnett v. Vapor Maven OK 1, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00423
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Barnett
Defendant:
Vapor Maven OK 1, LLC, Harminder Thind doing business as Vapor Maven, Gurpreet K Thind doing business as Vapor Maven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
