Cases 121 - 130 of 75,375
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Neal Forte
Defendant:
City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neal Miller, et al v. Joseph Wolk, et al
as 24-1863
Plaintiff:
NEAL MILLER, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Ryan Miller, a Minor, Deceased and DONNA MILLER, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Ryan Miller, a Minor, Deceased
Defendant:
JOSEPH WOLK, Individually and in his Official Capacity and GARY BOVE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
DOE v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
MICHAEL MILLER and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Carver et al v. Talanca et al
as 3:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Anita Carver and Richard Carver
Defendant:
Jeremy Talanca, Brandon Gonzalez and Mayor Judith L. Mehlbaum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. Wheeler
as 4:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Quincey Myers
Defendant:
Brandon Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MYERS v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS et al
as 2:2024cv00684
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS, UAW - UNITED AUTO WORKERS, AK STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
JOE MYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Renee Chrustowski v. NAACP Derrick Johnson
as 24-1847
Plaintiff:
RENEE A. CHRUSTOWSKI
Defendant:
NAACP DERRICK JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
