Cases 121 - 130 of 85,176
Stephen White v. Laurel Harry, et al
as 24-1799
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN WHITE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PHILIP JEDRZEJEK, BILL GOODWIN and others
Jermaine Vaughn v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1822
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE VAUGHN
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
MCCARY v. SIMCOX et al
as 2:2024cv01922
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MCCARY
Defendant:
CODY SIMCOX, JOHN DOE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. LOVERA et al
as 5:2024cv01924
Plaintiff:
JOVAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
JERAMY LOVERA, OFFICER BEST, SARGENT NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STANKO v. USA
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
THOMAS GEORGE STANKO
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
Stephanie Barnes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROBERTS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv05846
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, WELLPATH LLC and HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BRIGGZ et al
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Dupree Williams
Defendant:
Gregory Briggz, C.O. Robinson, Savasia Caraballo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJOR v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
JOHN R MAJOR
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SCI GREENE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox, Jr. v. Superintendent of SCI-Houtzdale et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Petitioner:
Vernon Andre Cox, Jr.
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Houtzdale and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
