Cases 131 - 140 of 218
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00851
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00852
Defendant:
Lt. Edwards, Captain Danzey, Sgt. Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galloway v. Taylor et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00825
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Heath Taylor, Lt. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Galloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eiland v. Russell County District Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Dist. Court, Heath Taylor, The Russell Commission of Russell County Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Eiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00714
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hornady et al v. Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
as 1:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Takendric Stewart, William Heath Hornady and Christopher Miller
Defendant:
Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Whitt v. Mills et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00648
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Defendant:
Cpt. Danziey, Lt. Ewards, Warden Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Cargail et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00647
Defendant:
Cpt. Cargail, Cpt. Danziey and Warden Mills
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epps et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al(MAG+)
as 3:2018cv00598
Plaintiff:
Dammuon Epps, Tanya Griffin, K. A. E. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Alabama Department of Early Childhood Education, Alabama Administrative Office of Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marlow v. Jonson et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00509
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marlow
Defendant:
Lieutenant Jonson and Heath Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
