Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 131 - 140 of 227
MEYER v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 1:2016cv00191
Defendant: BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
Plaintiff: NICHOLAS T. MEYER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff: Dewayne Rogers
Defendant: Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00099
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IN RE MOTION TO MODIFY SUBPOENA
as 1:2015mc00090
Petitioner: BFM TRANSPORTATION, LLC and BRAD F. MEYER
Respondent: THOMAS GIOVENCO
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES
as 2:2015cv00297
Petitioner: ANTHONY MEYERS
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KYLES v. BROWN et al
as 1:2015cv01307
Defendant: MARIS, BROWN, CLARKSON and others
Plaintiff: ALFRED KYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRALEY v. KELLOGE et al
as 4:2015cv00089
Defendant: CAPEHART, DOOLEY, JORDAN KELLOGE and others
Plaintiff: HARRISON TEDDY FRALEY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyer v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2015cv00296
Defendant: Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet U.S. Reconstruction, LLC
Plaintiff: Carol Meyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A. B. v. Meyer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00157
Plaintiff: A. B.
Defendant: Michelle Meyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES et al v. ELI LILLY AND CO. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00701
Plaintiff: NICOLE BRADFORD BOOTHE, SHALLEY LEA BUZARD, SHELLY RAE DAVIS and others
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?