Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 131 - 138 of 138
Hudson v. Correctional Medical Service (CMS) et al
as 7:2008cv00588
Plaintiff: Samuel C. Hudson
Defendant: Correctional Medical Service (CMS), Bibb Correctional Facility and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00227
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norsworthy v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00222
Plaintiff: Larry Norsworthy
Defendant: Alabama Department of Corrections, Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Caldwell v. Allen et al
as 5:2008cv00293
Plaintiff: Sammy Caldwell
Defendant: Richard Allen, Ruth Naglich, Brandon Kanard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00058
Plaintiff: Sammy Caldwell
Defendant: Richard Allen, Ruth Naglich, Brandon Kanard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Thomas et al (INMATE1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00018
Plaintiff: Calvin Alphonse Lee
Defendant: Levan Thomas, Janet Hicks, Nathan Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Prison Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02160
Plaintiff: Tyrone Marshall Bennett
Defendant: Prison Health Services, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Tanney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boissonneau v. Tibbs et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00914
Plaintiff: Michael Ronnie Boissonneau
Defendant: David Tibbs, D. T. Marshall and Quality Corrections Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?