Cases 131 - 140 of 149
Muhammad v. Stansberry
as 07-7543
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY
Chandler v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv01092
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Fed. Bureau of Prisons, K. M. White, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Stansberry
as 1:2007cv00994
Petitioner:
Tyrone Javelle Bowens
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chandler v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2007cv00937
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. M. White, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moreno v. United States Government et al
as 2:2007cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jose Munoz Moreno
Defendant:
United States Government and Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02154
Petitioner:
Warren Lewis Carlton
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brillhart v. Ragland
as 07-7053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART
Defendant - Appellee:
VINCENT RAGLAND, TIM AMICO, PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY and others
Jemison v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 3:2007cv00403
Petitioner:
Louis Carl Jemison, III
Respondent:
U.S. Marshals, Alberto Gonzales and Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schiralli v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02120
Petitioner:
Frank Schiralli
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muhammad v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02077
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
