Cases 131 - 140 of 471
SIMMONS v. FALICESANO et al
as 2:2016cv05709
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Defendant:
FALICESANO, OTTINGER, COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SIMMONS v. U.S. ATTORNEY et al
as 2:2016cv05033
Plaintiff:
JAMAHL SIMMONS
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY and USPIS OF PHILADELPHIA DIRECTOR/HEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. SIMPSON HOUSE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04855
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMMONS
Defendant:
SIMPSON HOUSE, INC. , SIMPSON HOUSE FOUNDATION , PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES-ROXBOROUGH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SIMMONS v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2016cv04068
Petitioner:
JOHNNIE SIMMONS
Respondent:
GARMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SIMMONS v. HIBBURT et al
as 2:2016cv04032
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY SIMMONS, III
Defendant:
DANIELLE HIBBURT, DEBBIE DUNLAP, ROOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv03994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WYATT v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00188
Plaintiff:
ROY WYATT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, SHIRLEY SMEAL, OVERMYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2016cv01503
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg Police Dept., Dennis Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SIMMONS v. HANNA et al
as 2:2016cv01032
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Defendant:
JUSTIN HANNA and CITIZENS BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
