Cases 131 - 140 of 140,593
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Dr. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 5:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent:
Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant:
Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaber v. Ray et al
as 5:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Faouzi Jaber
Defendant:
Warden Ray, Acting Warden Brown, Officer Titlle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bray v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Reginald Bray
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beane v. Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
James Beane
Defendant:
Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Vashun Lewis
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
