Cases 131 - 140 of 12,466
Hagos v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Victor Tuli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butsch v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00303
Petitioner:
Clayton E Butsch
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plechner v. Haynes
as 3:2024cv05187
Petitioner:
Richard Plechner
Respondent:
Ronald Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
John Baker
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Randhawa v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Satnam S Randhawa
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Mark Phillip, Mark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Seattle, City of Tukwila, Lisa Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dominguez
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Levi Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Lanum et al
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams
Defendant:
Bruce Lanum, Adam Clarino, Tony Donnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faustino-Anaya v. Andrewjeski
as 4:2024cv05011
Petitioner:
Arnulfo Faustino-Anaya
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
