Cases 131 - 140 of 87,433
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Vila v. Fashivly, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vila
Defendant:
Fashivly, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Carpenter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Carpenter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. PRO PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PRO PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC, CAMERON JAMES MOLTICH and JOANNA L. LEEDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
WESTBROOOK v. ADT SOLAR, LLC
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WESTBROOK
Defendant:
ADT SOLAR, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
TERRY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
DOYLE KENT TERRY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANNER v. ROWDY et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
MONTREALL BANNER
Defendant:
C/O ROWDY, C/O GOMEZ, MAC MILLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Optimal Sante, LLC v. Mediforum Co. Ltd. et al
as 5:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Optimal Sante, LLC
Defendant:
Mediforum Co. Ltd. and Jae Hong Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
