Cases 141 - 150 of 2,475
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. Turman et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Turman et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
John S. Smith
Defendant:
Blake Turman, Thomas Hugghins and Vikki Boyett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naramore et al v. City of Jasper, Alabama
as 6:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Eric Naramore, Kenneth Adam Miller, Terri Fields and others
Defendant:
City of Jasper, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Thomas
as 2:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Lynnette Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addoh-Kondi et al v. Jefferson County Commission,The et al
as 2:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Alexia Addoh-Kondi, Cynthia Bonner, Ja'Nelle Brown and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County Commission,The, Steve Ammons, T. Joe Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Smith v. Rogers
as 2:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Tara Rogers and Lynette Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Babers et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Antonio Tevereus Smith
Respondent:
Gwendolyn E Babers and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatfield v. Cadence Bank et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Akilah E. Hatfield
Defendant:
Cadence Bank, Shane Smith and Bailey Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Adrian (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Mr. Adrian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
