Cases 141 - 150 of 303
Wampler v. Carducci et al
as 4:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jo Wampler
Defendant:
Joseph Carducci , David Rickard and Desloge, City of, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landmark Infrastructure Holding Company, LLC v. R.E.D. Investments, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04064
Plaintiff:
Landmark Infrastructure Holding Company, LLC
Defendant:
R.E.D. Investments, LLC and Bobby Van Stavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Brenda Allen , Lucille Anderson , Willie Anderson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estep v. Officer Spencer et al
as 6:2015cv03097
Plaintiff:
Bobby R. Estep
Defendant:
Officer Spencer, Rick Cranshaw and City of Sparta, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey et al v. Republic Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00403
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bailey , Ruth Miller , Leland Miller and others
Defendant:
Republic Services, Inc. , Allied Services, LLC and Bridgeton Landfill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conaway v. McSwain et al
as 2:2015cv04040
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Conaway
Defendant:
Ellis McSwain, Kenneth C Jones, Jim Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Colvin
as 6:2015cv03063
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Bobby Davidson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel v. Penrod et al
as 1:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Catina Denise Daniel
Defendant:
Bobby Penrod, Rick Walter, David Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever
as 2:2015cv04006
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Jo Robertson
Defendant:
Conopco, Inc. d/b/a Unilever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Wilson
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY and Bayer Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
