Cases 141 - 150 of 189
Naranjo v. Reynolds
as 3:2009cv03238
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Naranjo
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barner v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2009cv03233
Petitioner:
Rodney A Barner
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Oxendine v. Reynolds
as 6:2009cv02965
Petitioner:
James Oxendine
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv02407
Plaintiff:
John Alan Miller
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections, Cecilia Reynolds, NFN McKay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Howard v. Reynolds
as 6:2009cv02088
Petitioner:
Stacy W Howard
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. State of South Carolina et al
as 5:2009cv03145
Petitioner:
John Alan Miller
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Cecilia Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Smart v. Cecilia Reynolds
as 09-6839
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE SMART, a/k/a Robert Smart, Robert D Smart
Respondent - Appellee:
CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Drakeford v. Reynolds et al
as 0:2009cv00775
Petitioner:
Sherman Drakeford
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds and State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Whelchel v. Reynolds
as 0:2009cv00578
Petitioner:
Bobby Whelchel
Respondent:
Cecilia Reynolds
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders v. Ozmint et al
as 3:2009cv00568
Plaintiff:
Michael Sanders
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Cecilia Reynolds and State of South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
