Cases 141 - 150 of 1,010
BURNETT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, REAGLE, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
HOWARD HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. DUNN et al
as 1:2023cv01363
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
DUNN, MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BIGSBY v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2023cv01347
Defendant:
BISHOP, DAVIS, Property Officer G and others
Plaintiff:
NICK BIGSBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NAYLOR v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv01345
Plaintiff:
JOHN NAYLOR
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMPSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JOSEPH MCCUTCHEONS, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
JABREEH DAVIS MARTIN
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, DAUSS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEROY JOHNSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAYJOR CONYERS, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PENNINGER v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
JASON D. PENNINGER
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON, CENTURION HEALTH, BRITTANY WILDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ARAMARK SUPERVISOR and ARAMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
