Cases 141 - 150 of 425,997
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FLOOD v. BUTLER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
JEREMY MICHAEL FLOOD
Defendant:
BUTLER COUNTY PRISON and COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Burk v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Burk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Boyd v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00631
Plaintiff:
Cameron Taylor Boyd
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Boyd v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Cameron Taylor Boyd
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
DAVID et al v. AMAZON.COM INC. et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
CAROL DAVID, HAROLD DAVID and CENTRE COUNTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, P OF H
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC. and AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FLYNN v. ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
KELSIE GENE FLYNN
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
