Cases 141 - 150 of 111,906
BERRY v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
JACKIE BERRY
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHEHADEH v. USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
JAMAL SHEHADEH
Respondent:
USP TERRE HAUTE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAJORS v. D.I.I et al
as 2:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MAJORS
Defendant:
D.I.I, VOIGHTSCHILD, PURTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PEDEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DEANGELO PEDEN
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, CHIEF RANDAL TAYLOR, OFFICER BRENT TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Floatin' Aweigh Excel, LLC et al v. GEICO Marine Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Floatin' Aweigh Excel, LLC and Thomas M. Dogan
Defendant:
GEICO Marine Insurance Company and Bay Marine of Chicago, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
