Cases 151 - 160 of 239
Keshwani et al v. Mason et al
as 2:2012cv00720
Plaintiff:
Shezad P Keshwani and Shemeena Keshwani
Defendant:
Jimmy Darrell Mason and Decker Truck Line Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shack v. Mason et al
as 4:2012cv00602
Plaintiff:
Joseph L Shack
Defendant:
John Mason, Carter Davenport and Talley
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trantham v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Harvey Joe Trantham
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Sandra Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mason v. Madison County et al
as 5:2012cv00380
Plaintiff:
James Mason
Defendant:
Madison County and Madison County Commission, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Pierce v. Carson et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Daundera Dwight Pierce
Defendant:
Arethia Carson, Willie Myles, John Mason and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E.Y. v. Sheffield City Board of Education et al
as 3:2011cv04237
Plaintiff:
E.Y.
Defendant:
Sheffield City Board of Education, Timothy J. Morgan, Charles Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason et al v. County of Etowah et al
as 4:2011cv03688
Plaintiff:
Shannon Mason and Angela E Mason
Defendant:
County of Etowah, County of Etowah Judicial Systems, William H Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason Corporation et al v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company et al
as 2:2011cv03252
Plaintiff:
Mason Corporation and Chamco II Inc
Defendant:
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and The Travelers Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
