Cases 151 - 160 of 210
COLEMAN MORSE v. THE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
as 1:2013cv00383
Plaintiff:
SUSAN COLEMAN MORSE
Defendant:
THE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. COLEMAN
as 1:2013cv00384
Defendant:
RICHARD KYLE COLEMAN
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HARRIS v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Defendant:
TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOHN OLIVER and K. SIERVELD
Plaintiff:
DONTE ROLANDO HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
COLEMAN v. J. EVERETT LIGHT CAREER CENTER
as 1:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
KAREY DAVID COLEMAN
Defendant:
J. EVERETT LIGHT CAREER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ADAMS et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2012cv01806
Plaintiff:
KENDALE L. ADAMS, MARTA E. BELL, VINCENT C. BURKE and others
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Defendant:
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
Shana M Coleman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
COLEMAN v. NDFIE
as 2:2012cv00273
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Defendant:
NDFIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. Shefferly et al
as 1:2012cv00307
Plaintiff:
Eddie M White
Defendant:
Anthony Shefferly, Heather E Hoffmann, Darrell R Caudill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. INDIANA CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION
as 1:2012cv01238
Plaintiff:
KAREY DAVID COLEMAN
Defendant:
INDIANA CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
