Cases 151 - 160 of 736
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01395
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Webster v. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv02102
Plaintiff:
Bill Clark Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lovingood v. Monroe County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2019cv00009
Defendant:
Monroe County, Tennessee, Bill Johnson and Derrick Graves
Plaintiff:
Andrew Josten Lovingood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whited v. Haslam et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
Bill Haslam and David Raush
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Whited
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Munkeboe et al
as 3:2017cv01356
Defendant:
Carolyn Piphus, Harold Dean Haney, Bill Haslam and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Lemont Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv00540
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2018cv01296
Defendant:
Morgan County Correctional Complex, Bill Haslam, Aramark Indestry Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The People of Ta' Al Amooruc Republic et al v. United States Corporation Company 1925 et al
as 3:2018cv01208
Defendant:
Pete Ricketts, Steve Bullock, Doug Burgum and others
Plaintiff:
Tasheka Kefla Bey, Kadeen Aqil Bey, The People of Ta' Al Amooruc Republic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beale v. Odom et al
as 2:2018cv02700
Defendant:
Bill Odom and Cheif Moore
Plaintiff:
Ron Beale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold et al v. City of Crump, Tennessee et al
as 1:2018cv01227
Plaintiff:
Tracy Arnold and Bill Arnold
Defendant:
Randall Warren, Tim Kelly, City of Crump, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
